-->

Friday, July 18, 2025

My kingdom for a decent title

 people write better than me, most times. 
They use more colorful adjectives designed to sway your opinion.
And so this is less of a blog entry and more of a question:
What pissed them off??

(or maybe) https://www.npr.org/2025/05/21/nx-s1-5389638/trump-executive-actions-american-history-culture

The bombastic article below says lotsa stuff but it is very pissed about NPR and the claim of "Systemic Racism" which the article says is a biggie lie. 
(I'd have to reread it to get a good quote, but the one about the whore is good enough for now)

(Link)

If you gloss over huge chunks of text like me,
You might miss the good parts about the "Heritage Foundation" and what they want.
We're subject to their script.
"Tyranny," indeed
 
(taking notes) George Soros, "Tides Foundation
Apparently incantations in speeches matter.


(We aren't supposed to enjoy msnbc, "The nation" magazine either)
But "Soros" piqued my interest.
Who??

Rothschild redux?


(Huge Chunk of text you should at least gloss over)
Define "Lobbying", like some razor-edged sword.
Want Zillions? Conform. 

Having said all that, I doubt they care about all the Anglophilia, kid's shows, I think instead public TV must have pissed off someone with their news.

I see this going one of two ways. 
They'll either feel liberated from the shackles of government oversight,
and rant full-bore on the injustices done (pick an injustice)

Or, they'll be super-meek and start being more propagandistic and loyal to their masters.
zillions are at stake!
These guys love to talk, and talk much better than me.
"elite Evil Cabals," delicious adjectives.


I'm revisiting this. Zoom-in, zoom out, Zoom in, zoom out, store up tasty adjectives.
Columbia University, presumably a bunch of really smart people, decided to pay
sixteen(?) milllllllion, instead of endure the withering adjectives.
(And mean teachers not getting their pay? But that's just guessing)
Pay, they'll go away, thinks Columbia (but they don't go away. Sometimes they come back)



Said it first, better too.


I'm still stuck on hackneyed words like "glorious" which usually refers to war.
I'd never think up "cabal" or "progressive" to frame a quote.















The one book I know of (and that's because they made us read it)
that uses adjectives adroitly is "1984",
but I can't remember any specific passages anymore.
(I really should read more exemplary propaganda, I guess)
The opening monologue of the sixties show "The Outer Limits" commands us to sit quietly while they control the television.
My dad liked the show but he hated the monologue and would jump up to change channels quickly, as sort of an anti-sheep protest (I guess).

Present-day conservatives have co-opted the little speech (of course they have) 
But anyway, here is a link to the speech.
https://www.tonyfunderburk.com/outer-limits/


Stay alive with Project 2025

I want to point out, in a very badly worded overlong sentence, that the slogan or whatever that I just typed, is totally original and from me, and my attempt to write tasty propaganda (like for bumper stickers)



PS: were most Columbia graduates, eventual republicans? I wouldn't know, but it could be a good question, I suppose. Yama-yama-blah-BLAH (they could talk up a storm, anyway)






No comments: