https://gizmodo.com/sam-altman-lord-forgive-me-its-time-to-go-back-to-the-old-chatgpt-2000672231
Terms: "AMA" ("ask me Anything")
Topics: People get sued for, uh, damn near anything (I'll get back to this one)
People (mentally healthy ones) liked ChatGPT 4 beeeeecause, it was personable and less expensive?
5 is too cold and unfeeling, they feel forlorn bereft and unsatisfied.
My 2c: the only people profiting off of chat-yada would be advertising, they could let machines try to win your heart with catchy phrases, little jingles, and hot AI women, but that's just my 2c.
Lonely people romancing bots is more of a sideline no one would talk about.
Here, a picture.
Thank you, back arrow.
Gizmodo had another article, something about the future of Doctor Who, which I feel that I know even less about.
I wrote (didn't I?) that you pick your show, and the streaming service broadcasting that show,
I wrote (didn't I?) that you pick your show, and the streaming service broadcasting that show,
and the ISP letting you stream,
aaand..I wrote it's too expensive, and gave up. Fiber is tied up with little introductory deals and purported temporary discounts that kick in after three months, but end eventually (they don't say when or how.)
In other words, slowish fiber looks cheap, but there is too much fine print to worry about.
An I'm not eligible anyway (They don't like apartment complexes?)
In other words, slowish fiber looks cheap, but there is too much fine print to worry about.
An I'm not eligible anyway (They don't like apartment complexes?)
53+37+tax and fees, let's guess $99
It must've taken an AI computer to come up with the convoluted rate-structure.
Why did they need "Speedtest"? Don't they control their own speed, or does it change on cloudy days or when the president visits?
I'm not convinced.
For $99 (before discounts) 2gig would be attractive...
And I already have a phone.
There are other companies, just as restrictive and with weird rules.
Who could possibly afford competing streaming services (two or three) on top of the transmission rate (eg, $99) to watch their favorite shows? we're talking maybe the better part of $200 a month.
Who could possibly afford competing streaming services (two or three) on top of the transmission rate (eg, $99) to watch their favorite shows? we're talking maybe the better part of $200 a month.
Speaking of stuff I know less than nothing about,
I've had bluetooth for years, and never use it.
Someone somewhere has a 65" TV that shows up.
That's just creepy, and the reason I don't use a bluetooth keyboard, but that's digressing....
Someone somewhere has a 65" TV that shows up.
That's just creepy, and the reason I don't use a bluetooth keyboard, but that's digressing....
Um, OK it says "connect" and it does, and four seconds later it disconnects, from my pixel phone.
Both devices ask me if I want to connect, and here is my code, do I want to connect?
Yes!
Yes!
It connects!
Then disconnects.
On a hunch, I sent a file from the PC to the phone.
Do I want the file?
Yes, I want the file!
Yes, I want the file!
Transferring...
I'm guessing that a person needs a streaming app.
Right?
IDK.
IDK.
I'm always imagining that Bluetooth is the hot girl on the subway with a few friends she wants to share songs with.
With *my* setup, all she could do is transmit files and let the receivers use their players to play it.
With *my* setup, all she could do is transmit files and let the receivers use their players to play it.
Doubtless you've all figured this out since 2004 when you were 8, but I don't know how to "stream" anything.
I can send and receive files, that's it.
So, (as in ages past) I look for a player that uses bluetooth, lose interest and ten years go by.
