House passes bill to increase stimulus checks to $2,000 - CBS News
Which fantasy shall I compare this to, a winning championship basket
or
Eating the girl in tight jeans?
Actually neither, because it isn't done, I'd need to invent one like "Teaching your cat to swim"
or "winning on 'The Bachelorette'."
Yeah, forget tight jeans. Long luscious legs. Pleasant smile.
Because (in this Fantasy) Dad comes home, your life is in serious jeopardy, etc etc.
Unless Jesus comes, the Senate will sit there on their collective shitty assholes while we all shout "PLEASE, sirs, may we have some more?"
 |
| Jim dandy to the rescuuue (go jim dandy!!) |
 |
| Mitch McConnell Blocks Attempt to Pass $2,000 COVID-19 Stimulus Checks (yahoo.com) |
 |
| (Today's 'Toon: Mitch 'Scrooge' McConnell (timesonline.com) |
So *why* are they bothering?
They keep passing bills that get abandoned. It's a fetish.
 |
| I need to borrow your headline for a sec, thanks. |
 |
| "Only 3499 with stimulus", naw, they didn't say that. But if you're looking to spend 12k or so on a stereo-system, this is a good start. |
(I bought a cheapo speaker from them a year ago and ever since, they think I'm richer than god/iApple.
Do you remember, a LONG time ago, a miniseries called "V"? I barely remember it except in trailers, and one of the trailers was a pretty woman eating mice, because she was actually reptilian in a disguised woman's body.
(A lizard in human form)
Feds probing if Nashville bomber believed in lizard people conspiracy (nbcnews.com)
So X-Men Supervillains and Superman and Hulk are fictional. The fact that they started out as comics and became very realistic parts in movies, doesn't make them less fictional.I don't think you believe me though,
you'll laugh snarkily that I've been duped by the lamestream media.
Where are the decent mouse-eating pictures when you want one? I had one a few minutes ago, a stereotypical one from "shutterstock"
I've proven that you'll take a way of killing time and selling insurance, and turn it into history.
Generations of teeny kids are weaned on your false stories..."Lizard People" indeed.
Let's forget all that and debunk myths about Das Keyboards, they're somehow better than the rest.
Or That, because of the supposed lockdowns and less places to officially go, less people will die this holiday.
Incredibly stupid preachers dooming some to death, drunks doing the same.
Bah.
Waiting here till midnight-dreary and the dawn that follows, to suck down massive quantities of tobacco.
Remember what I'm writing here, what with all the deaths and the shootings to come,
Judgmental-snarkiness edited out (judgmentally snarky remarks,) most hypocritical....
"Judge" is spelled exactly that way, it could have been "Judg" but you'd fume it was wrong.
(you'd fewm.) So then WHY is "Judgemental" incorrect?
The only way it'll pass muster is by leaving out the "e" before the m.
Pot and Meth can prolly get you killed faster than cigarettes, fuck cancer.
I'm gonna go google smokers and Covid,
but it's pointless, the story will be that Jesus died to stop you from smoking (he apparently likes ar15's and pot)
Oh, you think I'm drunk, do ya, or too full of wine?
Behold!
Verily I say unto you, deaths are coming to a highway near you.
But don't believe me, believe the lizard-people promoter (5g is killing you)
Some unfunny dewd went thru a LOT of trouble to make this video, and added a religious commercial in front (hint: Skip the commercial)
You're gonna say I'm a paranoid nut for reprinting this next Hoopla but:
A man got a covid vaccine, right? Nine days later he got sick.
He spun his plight like a pro, which he is: He only received part-one of two vaccines.
This, according to him, meant he was still vulnerable.
O,
OK
from a random government website, a list of Pay raises the US government (congress) got.
Well, anyway,
Odd list, that.
Because it kind of looks as if they felt a little guilty after 2009, or some legislation was changed deep within some budget bill.
What was said, what was *done*, I gotta go look.
Did their insurance get better, what about what they eat?
It's all in some document somewhere, but good luck finding it.
They spend lots of late nights worrying about what stuff they should not spend on.
Abortion is one.
Something about compensating Mexico, for another (the formal language legislating this stuff is worse than Wikipedia)
But I am looking for the bit about pay-raises.
What am I reading, last year's budget?
So I'm looking for the 94th part of PL-116, (Public-Law 116-94)
They are very good at making text-sandwiches, I'll say that.
Or are there people who get paid much more than they do, writing this stuff?
("Lawyers", don'tcha know)
GS employees type this stuff up, congress votes on it, but *someone* had to write it.
And you thought computer programming was hard.
At this exact second, I could not find the clause limiting congress' automatic pay-raise, it's buried in a sentence of a clause of a subsection of a title that I glossed over.
Or the number is a misprint.
Anyway, "better written, thought of it first, etc" Fact check: No congressional pay raise in COVID relief package (usatoday.com)
 |
| "Specifically reads" (Lol) |
Notwithstanding any other provision of law (so, uh, they're overriding any other provision of law or just saying "In case there's no other provision extant"??
"Notwithstanding" is a legal definition that I am unfamiliar with.
I've ranted myself into oblivion.
I meant to say, "They get paid tons",
notwithstanding raises.
No comments:
Post a Comment