Two guys, fictitious ones, being investigated for crimes or criminal intent
(like the show, yes)
So OK one guy has a mixture of googled searches for pie,
how to die,
(dewpie, etc
and by "etc" I mean sex, usually)
and the other guy uses a VPN and DuckDuckGo and an anonymizer.
Let's also assume the cops couldn't just contract out to glorified hackers to interpret and decipher what I just said (install keyloggers, spoof the vpn, bribe/coerce duckduckgo)
WHO will all the suspicion be laid on? The careless browser or the careful one?
And asking neighbors with grudges is a great way to an ensure a conviction (for what, IDK)
Oh, here comes a commercial (for lifelock, Mcafee) I've done something illegal, buy them or else.
ROTD: (brought to you by google)
 |
| How *do* you stop a body from (o nvm) (I smell a trending search-topic) |
(Hackers can't be trusted)
I was done but my Alzheimer's memory kind of kicked out a remark about inveterate gamblers and porn aficionados (invariably) having six or seven
viruses on the PC's I was asked to look at.
"And "Virus" is such a relative term anyway... Those ads that won't disappear, blocking the page, aren't viruses, they're *advertising*
(yeah, right)
And black hat conventions are for edification and study.
No comments:
Post a Comment