They start out simple, saying there are no gaps in space-time, so the floor of space and the walls of time have no holes, I'm down with that, but then they warp the floors, bend the walls, so it all looks twilight-zoney.
Moving clocks vs clocks that do not move: The moving clocks go slower
(Six zillion dollars, please)
(Six zillion dollars, please)
I can't find a grandfather clock running away real fast, will this do? |
Whatever is true, (washing my hands of the matter) we're talking microseconds, which (I suppose) is magnified by light travelling at a fantastic speed for billlllions of years.
I wish these pages I am writing had little ways to conceal my own bombastic rants,
sub-paragraphs no one would read unless they were *really* interested
(they never are.)
But writers writing for the masses seem to imply that time itself is warped and influenced by things other than time (but then they get all history-of-worldish.)
But writers writing for the masses seem to imply that time itself is warped and influenced by things other than time (but then they get all history-of-worldish.)
(link)
At some point, on a whim, they will raise my rent,
it's inevitable, and anything influencing that decision
(at a point in space-time)
is disastrous, the rent goddess happens by and jots little notes on some note-pad, influencing the time of the biggie rent.
Why is it warped? Why do gravity waves cause it to "Undulate(?)" |
Why are we here?
To give CEO's a fatter paycheck!
Space-time as a coordinate-system makes a lot of sense. Witness Picard running hither and thither across space and time, because "Q" was messing with his mind.
but...
Gravity affects time, they say. *speed* affects time, they say. (and other rants I cannot really express, affect the time of events to come in this space (rent increases) |
Is this a contradiction I see before me?????
Light has no or very little mass,
Light goes very very fast.
Light either ages faster in time (because no gravity)
or Ages-SLOWER in time (Because, speed)
Do the two phenomenom (enoms)
cancel each other out?
Light goes very very fast.
Light either ages faster in time (because no gravity)
or Ages-SLOWER in time (Because, speed)
Do the two phenomenom (enoms)
cancel each other out?
- The earth rotates at a thousand miles per hour.
- The earth orbits the sun at another 67,000MPH. (Linky)
- The Universe is reported to be expanding at 163,000 miles per hour.
Add up all of these thousands and you have the general speed at which your grandfather clock in the dining room is actually moving.
Is Light's "age" as it travels from points-west, get affected by lard-ass planets and Biggie-stars??
"A thousand years is like a day." (2nd peter 3:8)
If all those thousands of miles of rotation, orbits and expansion are factual, then (allowing for the relative expression) "Heaven" must not be moving very fast (or whatever)
In Sept '22 they trumpeted that a laser was about to fire, and then, nothing.
It's related, I swear...
It's related, I swear...
They got their $27M |
They can set clocks using a special beam of light
no longer are we bound to the second, they've split it up to femtoseconds (or whatever)
Somewhere in here I wanna edit in the word "Isomorphic" which means whatever trendy crap you're talking about, much like the word "Paradigm."
In fact, it's headline news, a computer scientist developed a new paradigm to detect isomorphism using a computer. His paradigm goes a little faster than the old one.
Bah, it's all click-bait to throw commercials at ya.
YEW don't really know what isomorphism is, but it's a pedant's wet dream.
YEW don't really know what isomorphism is, but it's a pedant's wet dream.
Google it, if you dare.
(mlmmf) |
No comments:
Post a Comment