Peaches and Dulcinea: witch-hunt (generic cancer)

Deliberately ignoring how highly profitable research funds are.
It's better than sad puppies.
Donate, our net worth is more than small cities, but we need to pay for lunch.

I got out of the wrong side of bed, right?
Waitasec, I have a quote:

Free radicals. Passive smoke.
Whatever they do, whatever they condemn vigorously, it just keeps getting worse.
Smoke, eat pot-roast and peanuts, you're damned for life.
But if you're holy and pure, it's because of everyone else.
The AIR is filthy-filthy because of free radicals

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hFDMq1K_6CM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0GFfr95E3ck

Most insurance companies (OK one, ONE tightfisted murdering uncaring SOB company) doesn't give a good goddam about whether you have cancer, and they'll refuse wheelchairs, they'll refuse Oxygen.
You're gonna die, they say, but they won't pay for equipment to ease your passing, that's socialism. Here, read this blather (Poor people die faster)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAND_Health_Insurance_Experiment#:~:text=Because%20it%20was%20a%20randomized,appropriate%20or%20needed%22%20medical%20care.

The paying for services vs not paying for services, made little difference in health results, which makes sense since they are the same fucking services!

People who joined the study poor and already sick were worse off than people who were well maintained with nice jobs.
(Translation: It's harder to treat people who're actually sick)

The result of the study:
EVERYONE should pay more, because....uh....O. We love america, we're no socialist society.

Lawyers are the modern goldminers, "Thar's gold in them thar cancers."

Who loses if Cancer is cured?
Techs,

Foundations,

Lead researchers,

writers of publications studies,

Medical professionals,

Insurance companies.

"red meat" is becoming more and more of a luxury counteracted only by how bad it is for you.
Well!

(linky)

*I* am looking (on sites like the talky one on the left) for a shampoo that smells like I live on a grassy estate, except I need it tomorrow.

Too late.

I don't want it to smell like women's perfume either.
And I want it from CVS.

https://intothegloss.com/2014/11/herbal-essences-reviews/

it's in code, I think, I'm not sure. The bust of a woman in a pond is totally gone, everyone everywhere wants it back, And this lady refers vaguely to it, ten long years ago(!)
Very vaguely.

I have a flavor of clairol "herbal"-something, and it's nice, it was expensive as hell, but it has no smell.

So if I listen to this lady, is she a shill, a used-car dealer,

or did I finally find the right f'ing one????

My nose is broken,
or
My bottle is fake;
either way, no fragrance for me.

The colors (pink) tell me who it's being marketed to.
Hey, why does smelling like a lawn so feminine?
A jungle, so girly?

So far all I know is to buy clear-plastic, or get stuck with expensive pimple-juice...

Anyway, OK I'll look.

(It's super gauche to smell in the store, so I never do)

A woman At CVS started out by saying there were too many choices, and then opening up bottles to sniff them and she told a fellow shopper how wonderful they smelled.

What?

OH!

How do we know these fancy-ass shampoos pre-sniffed by strangers, don't have cancer?

The organic free-range shampoos can go straight to hell....

Being allergic/intolerant to damn near anything edible, carries an extra burden.
I have to *listen* to your incredible bullshit on the off-chance it might be true....

I gotta have my red meat and peanuts though, sorry about that.

What about soaps, what about shampoos?
I used to get eczema from palmolive dishwashing liquid...

IDK.