-->

Monday, April 15, 2024

Brit Worgan (getty images) ghosts

 

If I believed in ghosts they'd be in the east coast or eastern Europe (someplace east)
(this is supposedly "western Europe," whatever,) and aren't these ghosts? If not, all "ghostly" pictures must be just as fake as this one, since they look like this only usually much worse (Loch-ness style)
This page is useless, I'm showing you what I have to work with.
I'm not starting a new research project, no way.
I just thought there was a pat tried-and-true method of making time pass (years ago, now, etc)
Plus I'm being artful (as artful as the photo) because there would be a huge glut of blurry bodies in a real train station, more crowded.
The artful part isn't just the clear building but the clear *people* standing near the ghosts.
But her pictures are boring and closeups, maybe it's a different Brit Worgan.

There's this old-fashioned TV studio device that merges two pictures into one;
I suppose it's all done by computer now, but (well for example) you could have two cameras going, one on credits and one of the show, and the white-on-black posters would overlay the broadcast picture.
The version the school had was incredibly expensive, mostly unused and I'm supposed to have busted it
 (touch a thing, and people blame you.
GD teacher prolly stole some part, or I scared the mice in the underpinnings)

I kept looking but Nothing comes *close* to being as good as this picture.
There's prolly some googly-term I'm missing, like "Bokeh" or whatnot.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/aemays/9727675132/ (meh)
https://www.flickr.com/photos/imageriepoetique/45705547104/ (hmm)

These people are super careful in case you'll rip off their work.
Rest in peace, people, I'm only browsing.

The title of THIS page looks inviting, but I'm not sure yet.
I had two captions (3?)
Is this the damn picture that started "boo Radley"?
Our porticoes should look this nice (seriously)
You guys spend lotsa time pranking people

A little makeup and suddenly she's
(o crap)
" À rebours "


(ROTD: you mean to say "au revoir" to a female but it comes out " À rebours")
A wikipedia about a ghost has this indistinct picture.
This grainy sepia-toned picture reminiscent of a movie.
ALL ghosty pictures are grainy....
OK there was this one of a kid on top of a grave, but it doesn't look real.


The creepiest one so far is some dead guy in a group picture standing behind another guy, as normal as pie.
But I cannot say whether that was only Frank on a bad day.
All the pictures I see show a magnified shot, which is fine but the original would have been nice too.
Plus some say it's fake.
(How would I know?)
But that guy standing in front must've had nightmares after someone said something to him.

I just had a thought about shadows.
natural-looking shadows always make a picture more realistic, except in the case of ghosts. (So the shade under the ghost's nose is suspicious)
No shadow, everyone'll say "It's fake" but if there's a shadow, is that *more* fake, more premeditated? example:



Ghosts seem to glow at night.
Why?

I promised no research...but would you rather have bombastic guessing?
Well! 
Assuming Judeo-Christian philosophy (mostly, protestant-baptist) is valid:
When you die, you await the grand Judgement, the final biggie that determines your worth.
Righteous Christians believe they just show their golden ticket, do not pass ...(OK forget the monopoly references) they get into heaven, OK?
So right now, the story goes, the dead are sleeping (beecause, souls need to sleep?)
And my  personal belief about souls rejoining the vast body of water called
 The Spiritual Sea, 
can't be right because there would be no politics, 
no gated communities, 
just one big ol' ocean to figuratively mix with 
and swim around in, etc (yes, it's in a video game.)
In These two scenarios (either) there would be no ghosties, they're sleeping or part of the great spiritual soup.
So who's a ghost? The mentally ill, (yeah that covers it)


No comments: